A triumphant return?

As my limited (Judging from the amount of comments) audience might know, I have taken an extended leave of abscence from my MLB blogging. The reason for this may have been technical issues--which still deny me the ability to edit my posts, the time-consuming nature of my posts, some frustration at not being read (Hopefully minor), or the astonishing fact that there are other things I do in my life beyond posting. Shocking, I know.

All of that now gets kicked to the curb now that I'm back, hopefully with increased regular attendence. That said, my last posts left me in an uncomfortable quandrary as I had some glaring errors.

As readers must have noticed in my two-part Albert Belle Hall of Fame case, Part I ends inconclusively (Having been both too long and uneditable), and I neglect to explain why I believe Ken Griffey, Jr. to be a trustworthy source and why comparing doubles to home runs in power hitters is significant (Done, but not very clearly). The last two shall hopefully be dealt with in later posts.

Other errors, less significant, also pop up.

I hope readers will forgive me for having made these unfortunate errors, it having been a long and extensive argument. I recognize the human tendancy for error, but that makes it no less easier when actually committed. Hopefully, future posts will not contain this same level of errors.

On another note, given the amount of time elapsed from my last post 'til today, I plan to publish a number of "retro" articles to compensate for the missed time. My first will come today, an argument for Steve Garvey's Hall candidacy that I intended to publish after Albert Belle's, but was apparently too exhausted to do so. I hope it serves as a persuasive account of the legitimacy of Garvey's Hall case, but then again, all persuasive writers hope that.